Standardised pedigree notation

An illustrated catalogue of the symbols, relationships, annotations and reporting conventions used to build and interpret a clinical pedigree.

This reference implements the standardised human pedigree nomenclature described by Bennett and colleagues in 1995 and 2008, together with the 2022 focused revision concerning gender, sex and carrier representation. Some interface and layout behaviours are software implementation choices and are identified as such.
← Return to the pedigree builder

Core symbols

The outer shape establishes the individual symbol. Additional marks communicate status, identity and uncertainty.

Square

Represents a man or boy.

Use
Individual whose gender identity is man or boy.
Structure
gender: "man"

Circle

Represents a woman or girl.

Use
Individual whose gender identity is woman or girl.
Structure
gender: "woman"

Diamond

Represents a non-binary or gender-diverse person, or an individual whose gender is unknown, unspecified or not clinically relevant.

Qualification
Use annotations where clinically relevant.

Multiple individuals

A number inside a symbol may represent a known number of individuals of the same status.

Use
Compresses large, equivalent groups without losing count.

Number unknown

Use “n” when the number of equivalent individuals is unknown or not specified.

Deceased individual

A diagonal line through the symbol indicates that the individual is deceased.

Unknown clinical status

A question mark inside an otherwise unfilled symbol indicates that affected status is unknown. It does not mean unaffected.

Gender and sex assigned at birth

The 2022 focused revision separates the symbol used for gender identity from annotations used for sex assigned at birth.

Gender identity shapes

Use the square, circle or diamond according to the individual’s gender identity.

AMAB, AFAB and UAAB

Record sex assigned at birth beneath the symbol where it is clinically relevant and appropriate to document.

Do not use nested square-and-circle symbols

The focused revision recommends the symbol corresponding to gender identity, with AMAB, AFAB or UAAB as an annotation where needed.

A diamond without an annotation indicates that gender and sex are unknown, unspecified or not relevant to the clinical question.

Clinical status and fills

Fill patterns represent conditions or states. Their meaning must be defined in the pedigree legend.

Unaffected

An unfilled symbol indicates that the person is unaffected by the condition represented in the legend.

Affected

A fully filled symbol indicates affected status for the defined condition.

Two conditions

Divide the symbol into separately defined regions when two findings must be shown.

Four-condition quadrant fill

Quadrants may encode multiple conditions when each region is clearly mapped in the legend.

Carrier pattern

Use a divided, patterned region for carrier status rather than a central dot.

Affected and carrier

Use distinct regions or patterns so that one state does not obscure another.

Presymptomatic or asymptomatic carrier

Use a legend-defined patterned region and supporting annotation when an individual carries a dominant-condition variant but has no current manifestations.

Legacy convention. A central dot was historically used for carrier status. The 2022 focused revision recommends divided, patterned fills instead.

Proband and consultand

The proband and the consultand may be the same person, but they are not interchangeable concepts.

Proband

An arrow identifies the affected individual through whom the family came to attention for the condition under study.

Consultand

A “P” identifies the person receiving genetic counselling or evaluation when distinct from the proband.

Relationships

Relationship lines describe family structure. They should remain distinct from biological and adoptive lines of descent.

Current relationship

A solid horizontal line joins partners.

Relationship no longer exists

A slash through the relationship line indicates that the relationship has ended.

Multiple partners

Show separate relationship lines where they affect genetic assessment or offspring structure.

Consanguinity

A double relationship line indicates a consanguineous union. State the degree when it is not obvious from the pedigree.

No children

Use a terminal mark and annotate whether this is by choice or for an unknown reason.

Infertility

Annotate infertility and its known reason beneath the relationship line.

Single-parent descent

A descent line may begin from one recorded parent when the other biological parent is not represented.

Children and sibships

Descent and sibship lines encode parent-child structure and sibling order.

Descent and sibship lines

A vertical descent line connects the parental relationship line to a horizontal sibship line.

Birth order

List siblings from oldest to youngest, left to right.

Half-siblings

Children from different parental relationships must connect to their corresponding union.

Generation and individual identifiers

Use Roman numerals for generations and number individuals from left to right within each generation.

Twins and multiple births

Multiple births branch from a common apex. Zygosity is communicated by an additional connecting line or annotation.

Dizygotic twins

Two branches originate from the same point without a connecting bar.

Monozygotic twins

A connecting line between the twin branches indicates monozygosity.

Unknown zygosity

Use a question mark where zygosity is unknown.

Triplets

Three branches originate from one apex. Add zygosity marks where known.

Pregnancy outcomes

Record gestational age where known and define affected fills in the legend.

Ongoing pregnancy

Use a pregnancy symbol with “P” and gestational age.

Fetal sex known

Annotate AMAB or AFAB and document how fetal sex was determined where relevant.

Spontaneous abortion

Use the reproductive-loss symbol and annotate gestational age.

Affected spontaneous abortion

Fill the symbol and define the affected condition in the legend.

Ectopic pregnancy

Use the pregnancy-loss symbol annotated “ECT”.

Termination of pregnancy

Use a pregnancy-loss symbol with a diagonal slash and annotate the indication where known.

Stillbirth

Use the appropriate individual symbol with a diagonal death mark, “SB” and gestational age.

Gestational-age annotation

Place the known gestational age beneath the symbol.

Adoption

Brackets identify adopted individuals. Biological and adoptive relationships remain visually distinct.

Adopted into family

Use brackets around the individual and a dashed line from adoptive parents.

Adopted out

Use brackets and preserve the solid biological descent line.

Biological and adoptive descent

Solid lines indicate biological descent; dashed lines indicate adoptive descent.

Adopted by a relative

Show both the biological and adoptive family structures where clinically relevant.

Assisted reproduction

These are relationship scenarios, not isolated icons. Available donor and gestational-carrier history should be recorded where relevant.

Sperm donor

Mark the donor with “D”. Do not draw a partner relationship line between the donor and the person carrying the pregnancy.

Ovum donor

Represent the donor contribution separately from the gestational parent and partner relationship.

Embryo donation

Show both gamete donors and the gestational parent without implying a partner relationship with the donors.

Gestational carrier

Mark the gestational carrier with “S” and connect the pregnancy to the person carrying it.

Donor who is also the gestational carrier

Use the donor designation and place the pregnancy beneath the person carrying it.

Double-gamete donation

Show both donors and connect the pregnancy to the gestational parent.

Annotations and identifiers

Keep annotations concise, consistently ordered and proportionate to the clinical purpose.

Recommended order

Age or birth/death year, evaluation result, then pedigree identifier.

Pedigree identifiers

Use identifiers such as I-1, II-3 and III-2 in research, publication and cross-reference contexts.

Clinical reporting requirements

A clinical pedigree is part of the health record. Record enough context for another clinician to understand how and why it was created.

  • Name of the proband or consultand
  • Family names or initials where appropriate
  • Name and title of the person recording the pedigree
  • Historian who supplied the family history
  • Date of intake or update
  • Indication for taking the pedigree
  • Clinically relevant ancestry
  • Legend defining every fill and pattern
  • Known ages, diagnoses and ages at onset
  • Known ages and causes of death
  • Relevant test or evaluation results
  • Confidentiality-conscious identifiers

Layout and line routing

The standards define the visual relationships. The application’s coordinate and routing model is an implementation choice designed to preserve them during editing.

Clinical routing

Uses horizontal relationship and sibship lines with vertical descent and child branches.

Flexible routing

Maintains connectivity during free manual movement but may introduce diagonal segments.

Coordinate model

_cx stores the automatic horizontal position, _gen the generation, x/y the rendered coordinates, and px/py manually pinned coordinates.

Complete pedigree examples

These worked diagrams combine the atomic rules into recognisable clinical scenarios.

Three-generation rare-disease pedigree

Demonstrates: three generations, proband, affected status and sibling order.

Conventions: standard symbols, orthogonal descent, Roman generation numbering.

Common mistake: collecting only the parents and siblings of the proband.

Autosomal dominant family

Demonstrates: affected individuals in successive generations.

Conventions: affected fill and vertical transmission.

Common mistake: inferring inheritance solely from a small pedigree.

Autosomal recessive consanguineous family

Demonstrates: unaffected parents, affected siblings and consanguinity.

Conventions: double relationship line and carrier patterns.

Common mistake: omitting the degree of relationship when it is not visually obvious.

X-linked family

Demonstrates: affected males and a carrier mother.

Conventions: patterned carrier region and no male-to-male transmission.

Common mistake: using a central carrier dot without a legend.

Hereditary cancer pedigree

Demonstrates: multiple affected relatives and age-at-diagnosis annotations.

Conventions: condition-defined fill and concise clinical labels.

Common mistake: recording cancer type without age at diagnosis.

Prenatal family with pregnancy outcomes

Demonstrates: ongoing pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and gestational age.

Conventions: distinct pregnancy-outcome symbols.

Common mistake: recording all losses as an undifferentiated “no living child”.

Adoption scenario

Demonstrates: biological and adoptive parentage.

Conventions: brackets, solid biological descent and dashed adoptive descent.

Common mistake: showing only the rearing family when biological history is clinically relevant.

Assisted-reproduction scenario

Demonstrates: donor gamete and gestational parent.

Conventions: donor “D”, carrier “S” and no implied partner relationship with donors.

Common mistake: conflating genetic contribution, gestation and parenting.

Gender-inclusive clinical pedigree

Demonstrates: gender-identity symbol with sex-assigned-at-birth annotation.

Conventions: square, circle or diamond plus AMAB, AFAB or UAAB where appropriate.

Common mistake: using nested square-and-circle symbols.

Multiple-condition fill and legend

Demonstrates: affected status plus a separate carrier finding.

Conventions: divided regions and an explicit legend.

Common mistake: using patterns without defining them.

References

The 2022 publication is a focused revision and retains the underlying 2008 recommendations except where specifically revised.

Bennett RL, Steinhaus KA, Uhrich SB, et al. Recommendations for standardized human pedigree nomenclature. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1995;56:745–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01408073

Bennett RL, French KS, Resta RG, Doyle DL. Standardized Human Pedigree Nomenclature: Update and Assessment of the Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 2008;17:424–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-008-9169-9

Bennett RL, French KS, Resta RG, Austin J. Practice resource-focused revision: Standardized pedigree nomenclature update centered on sex and gender inclusivity. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 2022;31:1238–1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1621